There has been an increased focus on scalability within blockchains and this has led to the increased use of stake-based mechanisms to improve the security, integrity and efficiency of their networks. Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) have emerged as the preferred alternatives to the popular Proof-of-Work (PoW) model due to high energy consumption. These new models are designed to be more energy-efficient than PoW, but there are differences in how they operate and achieve consensus.
If you're wondering what the difference between these models are and which is most viable, this article gives you detailed information about what PoS and dPoS are and their peculiarities.
What is Proof-of-Stake?
Proof-of-Stake is a consensus algorithm which was introduced as an alternative to PoW. Unlike the Proof-of-Work model which relies heavily on computational power and mining hardware,
Proof-of-Stake selects validators based on the amount of network token they hold and are willing to stake as collateral. This means that users have to lock assets on the blockchain to show that they are committed to the long-term wellbeing of the network. The more tokens a user holds, the higher their chances of being selected as a validator and this mechanism works because it would be unwise for anyone to try to compromise the network when they have made significant investments in it.
Features of Proof-of-Stake
● In PoS, users who want to be involved in the validation process have to lock a certain amount of cryptocurrency on the blockchain. This process is called staking and it helps make sure users are committed to the course. Validators are selected randomly based on the size of their stake.
● One of the most important advantages PoS has over PoW is its energy efficiency. Since it doesn't really solve complex mathematical problems through mining, it consumes less energy.
● The security of PoS is guaranteed by the economic incentives that are provided by the system. Validators have a financial interest in maintaining the integrity of the network because they stand to lose their assets if they try to compromise the system.
What is Delegated Proof-of-Stake?
Delegated Proof-of-Stake is a variant of PoS which introduces a system of representative democracy to the blockchain. Compared to PoS, it looks to get everyone involved and not just validators. This means that the average user gets to choose representatives who act as validators on their behalf. It allows users to delegate power to those who are willing to perform the tasks required from a validator.
Features of Delegated Proof-of-Stake
● Voting is an important feature in DPoS. It allows users to vote for a number of delegates who are responsible for validating transactions and keeping the network. Each person's vote is proportional to the amount of tokens they have, meaning people who hold more tokens have more voting power.
● Delegates are elected by token holders and this means they have to be accountable and represent the interest of the voters to keep their position. If a delegate acts maliciously, they can be voted out and replaced by another qualified candidate. This ensures a level of accountability you wouldn't find in other mechanisms.
● DPoS is known for its speed and scalability. By limiting the number of validators to a few elected delegates, it can achieve faster transactions and shorter block times.
Differences Between Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS)
While both rely on staking to achieve network consensus, there are subtle differences between both mechanisms and they include:
Decentralization
Both Proof-of-Stake and Delegated Proof-of-Stake aim to achieve decentralization, but they do these in different ways. PoS seems to be more decentralized in theory rather than in practice. This is because it allows anyone with enough assets to become a validator, meaning wealth concentration among whales could lead to centralization of power.
On the other hand, DPoS makes up for this by creating an inclusive system where regular users are allowed to vote for a chosen few to represent their interests.
Performance
DPoS is considered as faster and more scalable than PoS and this is so because it limits the number of validators to a smaller elected group, allowing it to process more transactions in a short period and create more blocks quickly. This makes DPoS a better option for high performance applications.
Although PoS is more scalable than PoW, it is still slower due to the large pool of potential validators and its random selection process. However, PoS is viewed as more secure in some cases for this same reason.
Conclusion
Proof-of-Stake and Delegated Proof-of-Stake are two consensus mechanisms that offer performances that are significantly better than the traditional PoW in terms of scalability and energy efficiency. Deciding which one is more viable depends on the needs of a blockchain network since both have their own unique features.
Comments